A common misconception is that Shirk is limited to idol worship. Unfortunately, this is incorrect.
Examples of the different types of shirk are;
Shirk al-Ibadah (Shirk in Worship): This involves worshipping idols, saints, or any entity besides Allah.
Shirk al-Rububiyyah (Shirk in Lordship): This involves believing that creations like the sun, moon, or stars control one’s fate or hold power over Allah’s will.
Shirk in Legislation and Judgment: This involves making laws or judgments that contradict Allah’s law or obeying someone other than Allah in matters of faith.
Outward Shirk: This includes open and apparent acts of associating partners with Allah, such as worshipping idols or graves.
Hidden Shirk: This involves inwardly believing in or trusting in something or someone other than Allah, even while outwardly appearing to be a Muslim.
It is obvious that the shirk of democoracy and partaking in it is Shirk in Legislation, as Democoracy attempts to strip Allah from this right and places this right in the hands of man !!
#staymuslimdontvote
#shariah
ISLAMIC DEMOCRACY ?
A brother asks:
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
“Akhi how would we reply to the doubt some bring basically saying we can have a democracy in an lslamic state but it’s based on a shariah constitution so like how in the US.
it’s democracy but they cannot vote to change the constitution since that’s the foundation, so similarly we could have something like that, But the constitution is shariah basically, And everything can be voted on aslong as it doesn’t go against the shariah.
So, like we can vote to legalise or ban things, etc, I figured I’d ask you for your thoughts on this”
Answer:
وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته
Democracy and Islam can never be the same. In Islam, we have the concept of shura, and what is used by the shura to determine outcomes is drawn from the Quran and Sunnah.
Democracy contrary to Islam, has its own system of lawmaking and passing bills and determining outcomes, politicians make the laws derived from their own whims and desires.
In fact Democracy is built on the majority ruling. This is achieved through the voting process.
You will be surprised to know that the idea of the majority rules was a concept that the Khawarij had put forth in order to govern their affairs and that of the people.
After their disagreement with both Ali (ra) and Muawiyyah (ra), and after establishing their administration in Haraura, the Khawarij now declared:
“Bai’ah is meant for Allah the Almighty alone. It is our duty to enjoin the good on the people of the land and forbid the evil.
There is no Caliph or ruler in Isla. After gaining victory, all matters must be settled by mutual consultation of the Muslims, and their *Majority should decide all issues.*
Both Ali and Muawiyyah are at fault.” (The History of Islam Vol.1, page 479.)
So, for those who adopt this view point, and screan democracy, calling it fair and just, or foolishly attributing it to Islam, are more in line with the view of the Khawarij and thier view on governance by majority vote.
Let us not forget it was Abu Bakr (ra) who was alone on his view to fight the Bughaat (rebels), while the majority were saying, “Are you going to fight a people who say Lailahailallah”
Allah (swt) sent Mohammed (saw) with a Shariah and a Minhaj, and whoever strays from it will be doomed!.
And Allah knows best.
-Abu ousayd
14 Rabi Al-Akhir 1446H
REACTION TO THE DEATH OF AN EVIL PERSON
The demise of a wicked person is cause for joy and a source of relief for the Muslim Ummah
Narrated Abū Qatādah raḍhiyallāhu ’anhu:
“We were sitting with the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ when a funeral procession passed by.
The Messenger of Allāh said:
((مُسْتَرِيحٌ وَمُسْتَرَاحٌ مِنْهُ))
“One is relieved and another others are relieved from.”
When asked what he meant by these words he ﷺ replied:
((الْعَبْدُ الْمُؤْمِنُ يَسْتَرِيحُ مِنْ نَصَبِ الدُّنْيَا وَأَذَاهَا إِلَى رَحْمَةِ اللَّهِ وَالْعَبْدُ الْفَاجِرُ يستريح مِنْهُ الْعباد والبلاد وَالشَّجر وَالدَّوَاب))
“A believer is relieved (by death) from the troubles and hardships of the world and leaves for the Mercy of Allāh, while (the death of) a wicked person relieves the people, the land, the trees, (and) the animals from him.”
[Reported by Bukhāri and Muslim]
____
It was said to Imām Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal, may Allāh have mercy on him: “If a man rejoices at what befalls the companions of Ibn Abi Du’ād, is there any sin upon him for that?” He, may Allāh have mercy on him, replied:
ومَن لا يَفرَحُ بهذا؟!
“And who would not rejoice at that!?”
السنة للخلال ( ١٧٦٩)
_
Imam Ibn Kathīr, may Allāh have mercy on him, said in the events of the year 568 AH regarding Al-Ḥasan ibn Ṣāfi Yazdin At-Turki:
«كان من أكابر أمراء بغداد المُتحكِّمين في الدُّولة، ولكنه كان رافضيًّا خبيتًا مُتعصّبًا للرَّوافض. وكانوا في خفارته وجاهه حتى أراح الله المُسلِمينَ منه في هذه السنة في ذِي الحِجَّةِ منها، ودفن بداره، ثم نُقِل إلى مقابر قريش: فلله الحمد والمنة، وحين مات فرح أهل السُّنَّة بموته فرحا شديدًا، وأظهروا الشكر لله: فلا تَجِدُ أحدًا منهم إِلّا يَحْمَدُ الله»
“He was one of the great commanders of Baghdad who held significant influence over the state, but he was a vile Rāfḍhi, deeply prejudiced in favour of the Rawāfiḍh. They were under his protection and influence until Allāh relieved the Muslims from him in this year, in the month of Dhul Ḥijjah. He was buried in his home, then later transferred to the Cemeteries of Quraysh. All praise and thanks be to Allāh. When he died, the people of Ahlus-Sunnah rejoiced greatly at his death, and they openly expressed their gratitude to Allāh. You would not find a single one of them except that he praised Allāh.”
البداية والنهاية ( ۱۲/ ۲۷۲)
____
The permissibility of performing the prostration of gratitude upon the death of tyrants and leaders of disbelief
سجد أبو بكر رضي الله عنه شكرا حين جاءه خبر قتل مسيلمة الكذاب. وسجد علي رضي الله عنه حين رأى ذا الثدية بين قتلى الخوارج.
Abū Bakr (Aṣ-Ṣiddeeq) may Allāh be pleased with him, prostrated in gratitude when he received news of the death of Musaylimah the Liar. Similarly, ’Ali, may Allāh be pleased with him, prostrated when he saw Dhu Ath-Thadyah among the dead of the Khawarij.
مصنف ابن أبى شيبة ( ٣٦٦ – ٢/٣٦٨)
PROTEST ADVICE
Recommendations for Muslims attending protests.
It’s important to approach such events with a clear understanding of one’s intentions and to maintain Islamic principles throughout.
Your responsibility for checking the leadership, maintaining modesty, and avoiding nationalist symbols while giving dawah and continuing activism beyond the protests is valuable advice for those who choose to participate.
May your efforts be guided by sincerity and righteousness.
Muslims attending protests:
- Intention: Ensure your intention is solely for the sake of Allah, demonstrating support for your fellow brothers and sisters in a way that aligns with Islamic principles.
- Leadership: Be cautious about who is leading the protest. Avoid gatherings led by those with misguided beliefs, such as shia, nationalists, or proponents of democratic slogans.
- Modesty: Maintain Islamic principles of modesty by limiting interactions with the opposite gender and refraining from using vulgar language during protests.
- Flags: Refrain from displaying nationalistic flags, as this can lead to sinful or kufr (disbelief) outcomes. Instead, consider holding flags with the declaration of faith, “Lailahaillallah.”
- Dawah: Use the opportunity to give dawah (invitation to Islam), share Islamic materials, and encourage good actions while discouraging sinful behaviour.
- Continued Action: Remember that activism doesn’t end with the protest. Continue making duaa (supplication), raising awareness, and showing support even after the protest concludes. True activism extends until meaningful change is achieved.
These recommendations are for those who choose to attend protests and are aimed at ensuring that the principles of Islam are upheld during such events. If these principles cannot be followed or minimized, it may be better not to attend such gatherings.
Ultimately, may Allah guide and support your efforts.
freepalestine #gazaunderattack #Gaza
- Abu Ousayd
7 CONDITIONS OF THE SHAHADAH
The Islamic declaration of faith, “La ilaha illallah,” has several conditions that are often elaborated upon by scholars. While interpretations can vary, some common conditions include:
1. **Knowledge (Ilm)**: A person must have knowledge and understanding of the meaning of the phrase and its implications.
2. **Certainty (Yaqeen)**: The individual must have a strong conviction and belief in the truth of the declaration.
3. **Sincerity (Ikhlas)**: The declaration must be made with pure intentions solely for the sake of Allah, without any ulterior motives.
4. **Acceptance (Qabool)**: The person must fully accept the belief in the oneness of Allah and renounce any form of polytheism or association of partners with Allah.
5. **Submission (Inqiyad)**: The individual should be willing to submit to the teachings and commandments of Allah as outlined in Islam.
6. **Truthfulness (Sidq)**: The declaration should be made truthfully, reflecting the person’s genuine belief and commitment.
7. **Love and Devotion (Mahabbah)**: The person should feel a sincere love and devotion towards Allah, understanding His attributes and qualities.
8. **Rejection of False Deities (Tark al-Taghut)**: The person must reject and abstain from worshipping or following anything or anyone other than Allah, including false gods, idols, or worldly desires.
9. **Obedience and Practice (Amal)**: The individual should strive to live in accordance with the teachings of Islam, practising its rituals and adhering to its ethical guidelines.
These conditions collectively underline the significance and depth of the Islamic declaration of faith, affirming the believer’s unwavering commitment to the oneness of Allah and the teachings of Islam.
KHAWARIJ AND HADITH
FACTS:
BUKHARI, MUSLIM AND ABU DAWUD NARRATED HADITH BY THE KHAWARIJ….
….BUT WOULD NOT NARRATE FROM THE MURJIAH!
__________
it is interesting that earlier scholars accepted innovators such as al-Khawarij to a degree for several reasons, You have figures such as ‘Imran b. Hittan, another Khariji, whose narrations are used by al-Bukhari, Abu Dawud, and al-Nasa’i.
__________
HADITH ARE OF DIFFERENT GRADES AND LEVELS
Ikramah is in those levels and he is a controversial figure due to his affiliation with the Khawarij. al-Dhahbi mentions this in al-Mizan al-I’tidal, entry #5716 (v.3, p.93).
__________
Abu Dawud said that from the people of desires (i.e. innovators), none are more correct in hadith than the Khawarij
(قال أبو داود : ليس في أهل الأهواء أصح حديثا من الخوارج ، ثم ذكر عمران بن حطان ، وأبا حسان الأعرج.).
__________
IKRAMAH ACCUSED OF BEING FROM THE KHAWARIJ
Al-Bukhari relied upon him because he believed that the Khawarij wouldn’t lie as for them lying is a sin and sin is kufr.
Muslim and Malik mostly avoided ‘Ikramah’s narrations except in a few instances.
_______
WITH ALL THAT SAID:
The Murjiah of the past could not be trusted, so the scholars of the Salaf would not rely on their words and opinions,
so why would you rely on the words of Murjiah today!
This article is in no way in support of the deviant Khawarij sect, their beliefs or understanding, rather it is to highlight that the scholars of the Salaf trusted them with Hadith.
Furthermore it is to show that there is in the Ummah a far worse deviant group that can never be trusted.
#murjiahexposed
MUSLIM FOR THE SAKE OF THE KUFFAR
Beware of the “Muslims for the sake of the Kuffar”
They are like parrots repeat the sentiments of the kuffar yet giving it an Islamic twist, their main call is to be accepted by them, even if that means changing Islam itself.
Years ago when the Kuffar had an issue with a Muslim man having multiple wives calling it backwards and wrong, these “Muslims” to be accepted, to fit in said the same and attacked anyone who differed with them, even when Quran and Sunnah were being quoted.
Yet they went a step further, adding “womaniser” and going as far as saying that such verses concerning polygyny was abrogated, changing the book of Allah(swt), and waging a war against anyone pushing for the marriage of multiple wives.
Today the biggest movement is that of the LGBT+×÷= and for years it has wanted to squeeze itself into the Muslim community, and the only way in is with these “Muslims”.
Never before the pressures of this movement were Muslims openly talking about immoral and evil deeds so publicly, yes these acts existed and were preformed by some Muslims, but it was very hushed, private and behind doors, there still existed the element of Hayaa (modesty) and fear of being out casted.
Now “shuyukh” “daees” “lecturers” rise to fame through holding lectures about porn addiction, masturbation and homosexuality, not knowing this was desensitising the community,
Being gay and Muslim is something we are pushed to accept with some of the above “muslims” saying we must accept them, this is how Allah (we seek refuge from Allah) made them.
Today the phrases “only Allah can judge them” “you don’t know what’s in their hearts” is no different than “Love is love”, well as long as it’s not loving four wives.
My dear brothers and sisters, and to the kuffar we openly and unequivocally say that there us no room in Islam for homosexuality to be accepted, it is a major sin, a sin behind the reason Allah(swt) destroyed the people of the Prophet Lut (as).
Those who are engaging in this act or have engaged in such acts need to fear Allah and repent, know that you being lured into immorality is not genetics, its satanic.
As for those who deny homosexuality is a crime in Islam, or claim it is permissible, then upon you is to repent, leave this idea, stop trying to challenge Allah in His right to legislate, openly stand against what Allah has forbidden, then retake your Shahadah, and re enter Islam!
Yes making Haram Halal, is an act of major Kufr (disbelief), and dying while believing that homosexuality is permissible, after Allah has send it is impermissible is clear kufr (disbelief).
As a Muslim, a follower of the last Messenger of Allah, who came with the last revelation and a shariah (law) for all mankind until judgement day,
I openly stand out clear and here, I free myself in front of Allah (swt) from the movement of the LGBT and the acts of their people, I also stand out openly against and free from the “Muslims for the the sake of the kuffar” who have altered the deen (religion) of Allah to please those in authority or to conform to the pressures of an evil, wicked society,
I advise my brothers and sisters to openly do the same.
Hudhayfah ibn Al-Yaman reported: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said,
“By the one in whose hand is my soul, you must enjoin good and forbid evil, or else Allah will soon send punishment upon you. Then, you will call upon Allah and it will not be answered for you.”
(Sunan al-Tirmidhi 2169)
-Abu Ousayd
WE DONT REALLY WANT WHAT WE SAY WE WANT
We say we want the Shariah, but when the shariah is not in our favour, we oppose it and run to man made systems
We say we love the Sunnah, but say “it’s not an obligation”
We want the lands of Islam to be free, but we want to attack those fighting for its freedom!
We say we want to be on deen, but will not divorce Jahiliyyah
Men say they want a practising wife, but when he has one, he says, “shes too boring, un attractive,” then goes looking for a Mutabarrijah!
Woman say I want a man who is religious, a protector, one with gheerah, but when they get one, they say “His too extreme, I want freedom”
We want a leader, a Shaykh to speak the Haqq, but when we see one cowardice overtakes us and we say, “He shouldn’t be speaking openly, that’s not wisdom”
Do we really want what we say we want, or are we just after an image or an appearance? Do we just want to look the part, sound the part, only seeing it from a distance.
If you are suffering from this sickness, then the first thing you should do is remember the words of Allah (swt),
يَـٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ لِمَ تَقُولُونَ مَا لَا تَفْعَلُونَ
“O believers! Why do you say what you do not do?”
كَبُرَ مَقْتًا عِندَ ٱللَّهِ أَن تَقُولُوا۟ مَا لَا تَفْعَلُونَ
“How despicable it is in the sight of Allah that you say what you do not do!” (Quran 61:2-3)
Then you need to realise that you have an issue that needs to be rectified, fix your mindset, and synchronise what pleases Allah with your heart, tongue, and limbs
Dont be pleased with your exterior while being empty from within, and don’t be fooled by the exterior of those who do not follow through,
beware of these traits and its deception as they are closer to hypocrisy,
Allah (swt) says,
۞ وَإِذَا رَأَيْتَهُمْ تُعْجِبُكَ أَجْسَامُهُمْ ۖ وَإِن يَقُولُوا۟ تَسْمَعْ لِقَوْلِهِمْ ۖ كَأَنَّهُمْ خُشُبٌۭ مُّسَنَّدَةٌۭ ۖ يَحْسَبُونَ كُلَّ صَيْحَةٍ عَلَيْهِمْ ۚ هُمُ ٱلْعَدُوُّ فَٱحْذَرْهُمْ ۚ قَـٰتَلَهُمُ ٱللَّهُ ۖ أَنَّىٰ يُؤْفَكُونَ
“And when you see them, their forms please you, and if they speak, you listen to their speech. [They are] as if they were pieces of wood propped up1 – they think that every shout is against them. They are the enemy, so beware of them. May Allāh destroy them; how are they deluded?” (Quran 63:4)
May Allah (swt) allow us to realise the truth and follow it, may He allow us to see the falsehood and leave it. Ameen
And Allah knows best
CRITICISM WITHOUT WARNING?
Public criticism and rebuttal of someone who openly makes errors relating to the religion of al-Islam does need to be advised privately, and this is well established from the action and understanding of the Salaf, and inshaallah I will bring some proofs relating to this issue in this article.
It should be noted that privately advising a sinner about his sin is a completely different issue, and the two should not be confused.
In the Quran, Allah (swt) has “publicly” corrected the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, on a few occasions, including the interaction of the Prophet with the blind companion, as found in Sura Abasa, regarding Abdullah ibn Umm Maktum, and this is of the greatest of proofs that does not require a second,
that is if someone makes a mistake concerningthe religionof Allah, public criticism is permissible without prior, private warning.
Umar (ra) was publically critised on multiple accounts,
1. Why he had two garments
2. Woman refutes Umar (ra) regarding mahr
3. His statement if I go astray, “we will straighten you with our swords”
Many other examples can be found in the seerah
The salaf also had some words regarding criticism,
Muhammad Ibn Bandār al-Jurjānī said to Imām Ahmad ibn Hanbal (rahimahullāh), “It is hard upon me to say: ‘So-and-so is such-and-such and so-and-so is such-and-such’. So Imām Ahmad replied, ‘If you remain silent and I remain silent, how will the ignorant person know what is correct and from what is false?’“
(Majmū al-Fatāwā 28/231, Sharh ʿilal al-Tirmidhī 1/350)
Imām Ahmad was asked about Husayn al-Karabīsī, he responded, “He is a mubtadiʿ (innovator).” On another occasion, he (rahimahullāh) said, “Beware of Husayn al-Karabīsī. Do not talk to him, and do not talk to the one who talks to him.” ― he said it four of five times. (Tārīkh Baghdād 8/65.)
The science of Al-Jarh wat-Ta’dīl, is well established in the shariah,
This is especially true regarding those who narrated Hadith, and those who were people of innovation and of thise who publically made mistakes
Imam ahmed himself was quoted in saying,
Imaam Ahmad, may Allaah have mercy on him:
1. Al-Marwadhee (rahimahullaah) said: “Abu ‘Abdillaah (Ahmad Ibn Hanbal) once mentioned Haarith al-Muhaasibee and said: ‘Haarith is the source of all this affliction – meaning the innovations of the views of Jahm. There is no calamity except for Haarith.’” Bahr-ud-Dam (pg. 99)
2. Habeeb Ibn Abee Hilaal: Ahmad said of him: “He is rejected.” Bahr-ud-Dam(pg. 105)
3. Habeeb Ibn Jahdar: Ahmad declared him a liar. Bahr-ud-Dam (pg. 109)
4. Al-Hasan Ibn Dhakwaan: Ahmad said of him: “His ahaadeeth are forged” and in one report, he said: “He is of no significance.” Bahr-ud-Dam (pg. 114)
5. Khaalid Ibn Yazeed Ibn ‘Abd-ir-Rahmaan Al-Hamdaanee: Ahmad said: “He is nothing.” Bahr-ud-Dam (pg. 114)
Bukhari and An Nasaee did the same. They mentioned people by name, their faults publically, and did not restrict it to private advising.
So if an Alim, Shaykh, Ustadth, or Daee and anyone else speaking in the name of Islam openly and publicly makes errors, correcting the error publicly is permissible as this allows the correction of this error that would have misguided or mislead the community.
None of us are free from mistakes, errors, and shortcomings, but the preservation of that which is authentic and correct far outweighs the image of the individual who has made the error
And there should be no favouritism regarding that.
And Allah knows best.
JESUS ‘THE PROJECT’
Last night on local TV (australia), a show called ‘THE PROJECT’ had a special guess who is a comedian and a homosexual all in one (may Allah curse him)
If being a homosexual wasn’t bad enough, he took a swipe at the Christian “Jesus,” not Issa (may Allah peace and blessings be upon him)
I say this because the mocking was of a man, who Christians allege was Jesus/God/son of God, 3 in 1 who died for everyone’s sins?
Yet Allah (swt) confirms in the Quran that Issa (as), the real Jesus, was not crucified, nor was he nailed to a cross for 3 days!
“…..But they neither killed nor crucified him—it was only made to appear so…” (Quran 4:157)
Islam and Muslims reject that divinity is attributed to “Jesus,” and in fact, this claim is seen as an insult to Allah, the religion of Islam and to all Muslims, we do not believe ‘God’ had a Son or was part of some trilogy dying for the sins of the people
Polytheism, ascribing partners to Allah (swt), is far worse than that of the act of homosexuality which is a Major sin.
Both actions are repugnant and hated by the true Muslim.
We Muslims love the real jesus, not the fake one who was nailed on a cross for 3 days, falsely attributed as being the son of God, or God himself
So if a homosexual mocks the nailed Jesus, as bad and distasteful that is, that’s for the worshippers of the cross to sort out, as this is their false God who they claim to Love?
But if a true Prophet of Allah(swt) is mocked, then the Muslims should stand up for the sake of Allah and say and do whatever is necessary in protecting the honour of the Prophets who were sent by the one and only true God, Allah!
We hope that the Christian community and the LGBT+÷= community go at it over this, and Christians should learn from Muslims what real Love for the real men of God is, and see how we Muslims are ready to prove that Love
But if you follow a religion that teaches you to turn the other cheek
“..But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also..” Mathew 5:39
Such disrespectful comments will be accepted because at the end of the day, both Catholicism today and the LGBT movement share the same thing, LOVE
So I say to any real Christians out there who truly love Jesus, I invite you to the religion of Islam, a religion where such comments against the Prophets of God are not accepted,
I invite you to Islam, a religion of submission to the one true God, Allah, a religion of justice, love, loyalty, and strength
A religion that will never bow to anyone or to any movement, as we the Muslims only bow to Allah.
-Ust. ABU OUSAYD