Month: July 2024

ALLAH HATES THE MURTAAD

abuousaydofficial1 Comment

Allah’s Wrath against the Apostate, except for the One Who is forced into Disbelief

Allah tells us that He is angry with them who willingly disbelieve in Him after clearly believing in Him, who open their hearts to disbelief finding peace in that, because they understood the faith yet they still turned away from it. They will suffer severe punishment in the Hereafter, because they preferred this life to the Hereafter, and they left the faith for the sake of this world and Allah did not guide their hearts and help them to stand firm in the true religion. He put a seal on their hearts so that they would not be able to understand what is beneficial for them, and He sealed their ears and eyes so that they would not benefit from them. Their faculties did not help them at all, so they are unaware of what is going to happen to them.

لاَ جَرَمَ

(No doubt) means, it is inevitable, and no wonder that those who are like this –

أَنَّهُمْ فِى الاٌّخِرَةِ هُمُ الْخَـسِرونَ

(in the Hereafter, they will be the losers.) meaning, they will lose themselves and their families on the Day of Resurrection.

إِلاَّ مَنْ أُكْرِهَ وَقَلْبُهُ مُطْمَئِنٌّ بِالإِيمَـنِ

(except one who was forced while his heart is at peace with the faith) This is an exception in the case of one who utters statements of disbelief and verbally agrees with the Mushrikin because he is forced to do so by the beatings and abuse to which he is subjected, but his heart refuses to accept what he is saying, and he is, in reality, at peace with his faith in Allah and His Messenger .

The scholars agreed that if a person is forced into disbelief, it is permissible for him to either go along with them in the interests of self-preservation, or to refuse, as Bilal did when they were inflicting all sorts of torture on him, even placing a huge rock on his chest in the intense heat and telling him to admit others as partners with Allah. He refused, saying, “Alone, Alone.” And he said, “By Allah, if I knew any word more annoying to you than this, I would say it.” May Allah be pleased with him. Similarly, when the Liar Musaylimah asked Habib bin Zayd Al-Ansari, “Do you bear witness that Muhammad ﷺ is the Messenger of Allah” He said, “Yes.” Then Musaylimah asked, “Do you bear witness that I am the messenger of Allah ﷺ” Habib said, “I do not hear you.” Musaylimah kept cutting him, piece by piece, but he remained steadfast insisting on his words. It is better and preferable for the Muslim to remain steadfast in his religion, even if that leads to him being killed, as was mentioned by Al-Hafiz Ibn `Asakir in his biography of `Abdullah bin Hudhafah Al-Sahmi, one of the Companions. He said that he was taken prisoner by the Romans, who brought him to their king. The king said, “Become a Christian, and I will give you a share of my kingdom and my daughter in marriage.” `Abdullah said: “If you were to give me all that you possess and all that Arabs possess to make me give up the religion of Muhammad ﷺ even for an instant, I would not do it.” The king said, “Then I will kill you.” `Abdullah said, “It is up to you.” The king gave orders that he should be crucified, and commanded his archers to shoot near his hands and feet while ordering him to become a Christian, but he still refused. Then the king gave orders that he should be brought down, and that a big vessel made of copper be brought and heated up. Then, while `Abdullah was watching, one of the Muslim prisoners was brought out and thrown into it, until all that was left of him was scorched bones. The king ordered him to become a Christian, but he still refused. Then he ordered that `Abdullah be thrown into the vessel, and he was brought back to the pulley to be thrown in. `Abdullah wept, and the king hoped that he would respond to him, so he called him, but `Abdullah said, “I only weep because I have only one soul with which to be thrown into this vessel at this moment for the sake of Allah; I wish that I had as many souls as there are hairs on my body with which I could undergo this torture for the sake of Allah.” According to some reports, the king imprisoned him and deprived him of food and drink for several days, then he sent him wine and pork, and he did not come near them. Then the king called him and asked him, “What stopped you from eating” `Abdullah said, “It is permissible for me under these circumstances, but I did not want to give you the opportunity to gloat.” The king said to him, “Kiss my head and I will let you go.” `Abdullah said, “And will you release all the Muslim prisoners with me” The king said, “Yes.” So `Abdullah kissed his head and he released him and all the other Muslim prisoners he was holding. When he came back, `Umar bin Al-Khattab said, “Every Muslim should kiss the head of `Abdullah bin Hudhafah, and I will be the first to do so.” And he stood up and kissed his head. May Allah be pleased with them both.

(Excerpt from Tafsir ibn Kathir)

EXCEPT HE WHO IS FORCED

abuousaydofficialLeave a comment

The word “Ikrah” means “force, coercion, compulsion etc.” and “Mukrah,” which comes from the word “ikrah,” literally means “one who is forced.”

Allaah says:

“Whoever disbelieved in Allaah after his belief, except him who is forced thereto and whose heart is at rest with Faith but such as open their breasts to disbelief, on them is wrath from Allaah, and theirs will be a great torment. That is because they loved and preferred the life of this world over that of the Hereafter. And Allaah guides not the people who disbelieve.” [an-Nahl 16:106-107]

ibn Abbas said: “This verse was revealed about ‘Ammar ibn Yasir. The idolaters had taken him away along with his father Yasir, his mother Sumayyah, Suhayb [al-Rumi], Bilal [ibn Rabah], Khabbab [ibn al-Aratt] and Salim [the client of Hudhayfah] and tortured them. As for Sumayyah, she was tied up between two camels and stabbed with a spear in her female organ. She was told: ‘You embraced Islam for the men’, and was then killed. Her husband Yasir was also killed. They were the first two persons who were killed in Islam. As for ‘Ammar, he was coerced to let them hear what they wanted to hear. Rasoolullaah, saAllaahu alayhi wa salam, was told that ‘Ammar has renounced faith, but he said: ‘Never, ‘Ammar is filled with faith from his head to his toes; faith is admixed with his flesh and blood!’ ‘Ammar then went to see the Rasoolullaah, saAllaahu alayhi wa salam, crying. Rasoolullaah, saAllaahu alayhi wa salam, wiped his tears with his own hand and said: ‘if they return to you, let them hear again what you told them.’ Then, Allaah, exalted is He, revealed this verse”.

Imaam Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab said regarding these verses:
“So Allaah didn’t excuse anyone except the Mukrah whose heart is firm upon Imaan and Tawhid.  And it’s known by necessity that it’s impossible to coerce someone to change his beliefs; but it’s possible to change his speech and actions.  So this verse has clarified that whoever utters a word of kufr, or does an action of kufr, then he has indeed become a kaafir with the exclusion of the Mukrah who is firm upon Tawhid in his heart.  And as mentioned in the verse, he becomes a kaafir because he preferred the worldly life, not because he changed his beliefs.” (Tarikh ibn Ghannam)

Imaam Sulayman ibn Abdullaah stated in his book “ad-Dala’il Fi Hukm Muwalat Ahlul-Ishrak” under the ‘Fourteenth Evidence’ commenting on these verses of an-Nahl 106-107:

“So He (Allaah) has made a judgment that is unchangeable- That whosoever turns back from his deen to kufr, then he is a kaafir. Regardless of whether he had the excuse of khawf (fear) for his life, wealth, family, or not; and whether he committed kufr both internally (with his heart) and externally (through actions), or only externally and not internally (i.e. only through actions, without the heart); and whether he committed kufr through his actions and his speech, or with just one of the two and not the other; and whether or not he committed kufr because of his desire to attain some worldly benefit from the mushrik; he becomes a kafir in each and every situation – except for the Mukrah. And he is the ‘Maghsub’ in our language. (Derived from “Ghasaba Yaghsibu”- which implies the meanings of “coerce, compel, force, extort, seize unlawfully, conquer, subdue, rape, etc.” And Maghsub is the one who is “coerced, compelled, forced, subdued, etc.” According to classical linguists: “Someone who is forced to do something he dislikes by means of subjugation and compulsion.” See Lisan Al-‘Arab 3/526, and Al-Misbah Al- Munir 2/729)

So if a person is forced to do kufr; and it is said to him ‘Commit kufr! Or else we shall kill you- or we will torture you’; or the mushrik take him and beat him (severely) – and it is not possible for him to be rid (of this torment) except by agreeing with them; then it is permissible for him to agree with them externally (through actions or speech) – with the condition that his heart rests upon Imaan – meaning firmly established upon it and believing in it. But as for him agreeing with them with his heart, then he is a kaafir- even if he is a Mukrah.

And what is apparent from the words of Imaam Ahmad, is that in the first situation, he would not be a Mukrah- unless the mushrik had tortured him. Because when Yahya Ibn Ma’een entered upon him while he was ill, he (Yahya) greeted him with Salaam but he (Imaam Ahmad) did not return his Salaam. So Yahya began to appeal to him saying: “The hadeeth of ‘Ammar (O Ahmad)! And Allaah said ‘excluding he who is forced thereto while his heart is at rest with Imaan’.” So Ahmad turned his face to the other side; so Yahya exclaimed, ‘He does not accept an excuse?!’ So when Yahya was leaving, Imaam Ahmad said, ‘He uses the hadeeth of Ammar as proof, and the hadeeth of Ammar is ‘I passed by them (the mushrik) while they were insulting you (O Rasoolullaah) – so I forbid them (to say such things), so then they tortured me…’ And you, it is said to you ‘We want to torture you’.” (Meaning that ‘Ammar was actually tortured, and Imaam Ahmad was saying that they themselves were not in that condition yet, but rather were merely being threatened. So mere threats are not a valid Ikrah which would permit kufr.) So Yahya said, “I swear by Allaah! I have not seen anyone under the surface of the sky of Allah who understands the deen of Allaah better than you.’ (Ibn Abu Ya’la in his At-Tabaqat 1/404, and Ibn Al-Jawzi in Manaqib Al-Imaam Ahmad on the authority of Abu Bakr Al-Marwathi 474)

Then He informed that those murtad, who opened their hearts to kufr, even though they are sure of the haqq; and that they said ‘We did not do this except because of khawf’- but still ‘on them is wrath from Allaah, and theirs will be a great torment.’

Then He informed that the reason for this kufr and eternal punishment – is not because they believed in shirk; nor because of ignorance about tawhid; nor because of hatred for the deen; nor because of love for kufr- rather, the reason is merely because of a bit from the bits of the dunya (worldly life), which he preferred above the deen and the pleasure of the Lord of the Worlds.

So He said,

“That is because they loved and preferred the life of this world over that of the Hereafter. And Allah does not guide the kafir. (Al-Nahl 16:107-109)

So He has made takfir of them. And He informed that He will not guide them, even though they try to excuse themselves with the plea that they (only did it out of) lust for the dunya.

Then He informed that these are murtad, because they preferred the life of the dunya rather than the akhirah; they are the ones whose hearts, hearing, and sight Allah has sealed, and that they are the oblivious ones; then He informed (us of their) confirmed reality:

‘That in the Hereafter, they will be the losers.’ (An-Nahl 16:109)

SENATOR OF THE TAGHUT LABELLED BRAVE BY LOCAL SHAYKH

abuousaydofficialLeave a comment

What was so brave? that she left for her stance regarding Palestine, so now she deserves the Muslim community to get behind her!

I’m from the Muslim community, and anyone who stands by a muskrika and is not brave enough to reject the original kufr she was in does not speak on my behalf,

She still leaves as a murtaad, she still is a rafidhi, she still has not made open repentance from being a taghout herself…..

And none of these superstar shuyukh had told her about her kufr, but now praise her for leaving

“They used not to forbid one another from Al-Munkar (wrong, evildoing, sins, polytheism, disbelief) which they committed. Vile indeed was what they used to do” Quran 5:79

Ibn ‘Atiyah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:

There is consensus that forbidding evil is obligatory for the one who is able to do it and is safe from harm to himself or the Muslims. But if he fears (harm), then he may denounce it in his heart and shun the doer of evil and not mix with him.

Tafseer al-Qurtubi (6/253).

Anyone who can see the truth for what it is, then gives excuses to these sorts of people is nothing but a silent devil!

As for the silence on her participation in Demon-cracy and for those who, due to their ignorance say “The ends justify the means” – this is wrong and not from our Islamic legislation.

Haram, or in this case shirk, does not justify the ends to bring “peace in Palestine” a Muslims main priority is to save himself from shirk, Tawheed is the only safety in the hereafter don’t let anyone distort this.

Tawheed is Maslahah – Shirk is Mafsadah, so be brave enough to know this very well and do not be swayed regarding it.

UPROAR OVER SENATOR FATIMAH PAGAN

abuousaydofficialLeave a comment

There is an uproar in the Muslim Australian community over Senator Fatima Paymans suspension from the Labour party,

But there was no uproar about her suspension from Islam when she joined a system of Shirk….

Anyone who partakes in Democracy, advocates for it, rules by it, joins in on it, or as one Murtad claiming to be a shaykh said when encouraging muslims to vote “I see it as a religious obligation”,

Anyone who does all this has not understood Islam or what it means to reject Taghout (false deities)

Democracy is a man made system of Shirk that seeks to challenge Allah (swt) in Tawheed al-Hakimiyyah and seeks to challenge the Shariah in what is permissible and impermissible, it seeks to be the law maker when the only law maker is Allah!

Democracy is a religion, it’s Mayors are it’s altar boys, it’s politicians are it’s priests and rabbis, it’s parliament house is it’s place of worship, and it’s Prime Ministers are it’s Lords

A Muslim can not use a system of Kufr/Shirk in order to bring about any justice, not for Palestine or anywhere else.

There can never be Maslahah in Shirk, until the Ummah purifies it’s Tawheed we are not deserving of any victory!

Return back to the shariah of Allah if you truly want to see change…

#dontevotestaymuslim #democracy #shirk

The Six Levels of Knowledge

abuousaydofficialLeave a comment

These are the 6 levels on understanding knowledge.

1.  True Knowledge


To understand something in its reality, from its proofs, with certainty and without doubt
• Allah
• Prayer
• Muhammad (saw)

2. Al jahlul baseet, slight ignorance.

To know something in detail but may have a slight  aspect about it that he is ignorant about

• Badr. He knows it happened, where it happened who were the two parties, but doesn’t know for example the number of Muslims who participated, or doest know its exact date, but with a little extra studies will reach full understanding.

3. Al Jahlul Murakkab, compounded ignorance.

This is ignorance built upon ignorance, that is knowing something that can never be true.

Knowledge that is completely wrong and in opposition to the truth

Example
• He believes that n inheritance the grandfather is entitled to half the wealth
• A person who divorces his wife can remarry over and over because he thinks with every re marriage he gets all his 3 divorces back

4. Ash-Shakk, doubt.

But this doubt is a doubt of 50 / 50. He believes that one thing it true, yet there is something that opposes this with another thing that he believes is true.

he believes the wrong can be right, or the right wrong, he’s someone stuck in the middle, and in our deen there is no room for shakk

We do not act on shakk.
• A person says there is a 50 50 possibility that the sun have set, it could be up or down, in this case this person if he was fasting does not break the fasting nor pray the meghrib prayer

5. Dhuun, suspicion.


This is having understood something, but there is a small suspicion that there is something that opposes it. Something less likely to be true, 80% true but suspect 20% could be there

Example
• You live in a valley, you are sure that the sun has set, your positive, but then you start having some suspicion, is it or not, here the facts out weigh the suspicion, so you break your fast and pray
• A person who made wudu, and he is certain he has made wudu, but then he has Dhun, did I break my wudu or not…… here we say doubt does not overrule certainty, so pray and don’t make wudu

6. Al-Wahn, delusion.

This is having absolutely no daleel, difference of opinion, nothing, wahn is knowing something that you know there is clear evidence that you shouldn’t be doing that thing.

These were the levels for the Muslim regarding the levels of knowledge

Just to add, regarding ignorance there is what is called, jahlul kamil, total or complete ignorance and this is only for the kaffir.

The most important thing to re established is that knowledge and understanding can only be obtained prom the correct sources The Quran and sunnah.