What was so brave? that she left for her stance regarding Palestine, so now she deserves the Muslim community to get behind her!
I’m from the Muslim community, and anyone who stands by a muskrika and is not brave enough to reject the original kufr she was in does not speak on my behalf,
She still leaves as a murtaad, she still is a rafidhi, she still has not made open repentance from being a taghout herself…..
And none of these superstar shuyukh had told her about her kufr, but now praise her for leaving
“They used not to forbid one another from Al-Munkar (wrong, evildoing, sins, polytheism, disbelief) which they committed. Vile indeed was what they used to do” Quran 5:79
Ibn ‘Atiyah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:
There is consensus that forbidding evil is obligatory for the one who is able to do it and is safe from harm to himself or the Muslims. But if he fears (harm), then he may denounce it in his heart and shun the doer of evil and not mix with him.
Tafseer al-Qurtubi (6/253).
Anyone who can see the truth for what it is, then gives excuses to these sorts of people is nothing but a silent devil!
As for the silence on her participation in Demon-cracy and for those who, due to their ignorance say “The ends justify the means” – this is wrong and not from our Islamic legislation.
Haram, or in this case shirk, does not justify the ends to bring “peace in Palestine” a Muslims main priority is to save himself from shirk, Tawheed is the only safety in the hereafter don’t let anyone distort this.
Tawheed is Maslahah – Shirk is Mafsadah, so be brave enough to know this very well and do not be swayed regarding it.