Argument #4 | Alliance of Al-Fudhoul A further example of imaginative evidence is wrongly justifying the prohibited actions of voting for man-made law or sharing power with kufr regimes by the Islamic opinion which permits the leader of the state to enter into an agreement i.e. a treaty with another state to protect travellers who wish to visit Makkah in Hajj and which is called Hilf Al- Fudhoul because the messenger Muhammad (SAW) said: “If they invite me to enter an alliance like Hilf Al-Fudhoul I will enter it”
Knowing full well that no one is allowed to be involved in the duties of the state except the leader of the Islamic state i.e. the Khaleefah, not any individual or groups.
This alliance did not mean the rules & regulations of the Shariah where now stripped, nor did it mean Muhammad(saw) would need to rule and abide by democracy, or replace Allah(swt) as the law maker I wonder What the relationship is between the actions of the messenger Muhammad(SAW) who abided by the commands of Allah(SWT) who permitted him(SAW) to enter a treaty in his capacity as a leader & the prohibited actions of those going to vote for man-made law or sharing power with kufr regimes or those entering treaties in their capacity as individuals or groups!! #staymuslimdontvote
